Uneven development in market-based supplies of new micromobility services: the case of new e-scooter services
Geels, F. W. The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems. A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930). Technol. Anal. Strat. Manag. 17, 445–476 (2005).
Google Scholar
Geels, F. W. A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions. Introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. J. Transp. Geogr. 24, 471–482 (2012).
Google Scholar
Urry, J. The ‘system’ of automobility. Theory, Cult. Soc. 21, 25–39 (2004).
Google Scholar
Smith, N. Uneven development. Nature, capital, and the production of space (Verso, 2010).
Reckwitz, A. End of Illusions. Politics, economics and culture in late modernity (Polity Press, Cambridge, 2021).
Abduljabbar, R. L., Liyanage, S. & Dia, H. The role of micro-mobility in shaping sustainable cities. A systematic literature review. Transp. Res. Part D 92, 102734 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gössling, S. Integrating e-scooters in urban transportation. Problems, policies, and the prospect of system change. Transp. Res. Part D79, 102230 (2020).
Google Scholar
Laa, B. & Leth, U. Survey of E-scooter users in Vienna. Who they are and how they ride. J. Transp. Geogr. 89, 102874 (2020).
Google Scholar
Meng, S. ’a & Brown, A. Docked vs. dockless equity. Comparing three micromobility service geographies. J. Transp. Geogr. 96, 103185 (2021).
Google Scholar
Srnicek, N. Platform capitalism (Polity, 2017).
Nyblom, Å. Making plans or “just thinking about the trip”? Understanding people’s travel planning in practice. J. Transp. Geogr. 35, 30–39 (2014).
Google Scholar
Fitt, H. & Curl, A. The early days of shared micromobility. A social practices approach. J. Transp. Geogr. 86, 102779 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shaheen, S. & Cohen, A. Shared micromobility. Policy and practices in the United States. In A Modern Guide to the Urban Sharing Economy (eds, Sigler, T. & Corcoran, J.) 166–180 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021).
Foissaud, N., Gioldasis, C., Tamura, S., Christoforou, Z. & Farhi, N. Free-floating e-scooter usage in urban areas. A spatiotemporal analysis. J. Transp. Geogr. 100, 103335. (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, A. et al. Comprehensive comparison of e-scooter sharing mobility. Evidence from 30 European cities. Transp. Res. Part D 105, 103229 (2022).
Google Scholar
Reck, D. J., Martin, H. & Axhausen, K. W. Mode choice, substitution patterns and environmental impacts of shared and personal micro-mobility. Transp. Res. Part D 102, 103134 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yang, H. et al. Impact of e-scooter sharing on bike sharing in Chicago. Transp. Res. Part A 154, 23–36, (2021).
Google Scholar
Bell, D. The coming of post-industrial society. A venture in social forecasting (Basic Books, 1976).
Docherty, I., Marsden, G. & Anable, J. The governance of smart mobility. Transp. Res. Part A 85, 114–125 (2018).
Firnkorn, J. & Müller, M. Selling mobility instead of cars. New business strategies of automakers and the impact on private vehicle holding. Bus. Strategy Environ. 21, 264–280 (2012).
Google Scholar
Rifkin, J. The age of access. The new culture of hypercapitalism, where all of life is a paid-for experience (Tarcher/Putnam, 2000).
Shaheen, S. A. & Chan, N. Mobility and the sharing economy. Potential to facilitate the first- and last-mile public transit connections. Built Environ. 42, 573–588 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chlond, B. Making people independent from the car – multimodality as a strategic concept to reduce CO2-emissions. In Cars and carbon (ed. Zachariadis, T. I.) 269–293 (Springer, 2012).
Groth, S. & Kuhnimhof, T. Multimodality in transportation. In International Encyclopedia of Transportation, 5 (ed. R. Vickerman, R.) 118–126 (Elsevier, 2021).
Huang, E., Yin, Z., Broaddus, A. & Yan, X. Shared e-scooters as a last-mile transit solution? Travel behavior insights from Los Angeles and Washington D.C. Travel Behav. Soc. 34, 100663 (2024).
Google Scholar
Nobis, C. Multimodality. Facets and causes of sustainable mobility behavior. Transp. Res. Rec. 2010, 35–44 (2007).
Google Scholar
Firnkorn, J. & Müller, M. Free-floating electric carsharing-fleets in smart cities. The dawning of a post-private car era in urban environments?. Environ. Sci. Policy 45, 30–40 (2015).
Google Scholar
Kopp, J., Gerike, R. & Axhausen, K. W. Do sharing people behave differently? An empirical evaluation of the distinctive mobility patterns of free-floating car-sharing members. Transportation 42, 449–469 (2015).
Google Scholar
Oeschger, G., Carroll, P. & Caulfield, B. Micromobility and public transport integration. The current state of knowledge. Transp. Res. Part D 89, 102628 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yin, Z. et al. Shared micromobility as a first- and last-mile transit solution? Spatiotemporal insights from a novel dataset. J. Transp. Geogr. 114, 103778 (2024).
Google Scholar
Badia, H. & Jenelius, E. Shared e-scooter micromobility. Review of use patterns, perceptions and environmental impacts. Transp. Rev. 43, 811–837 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cornet, Y., Lugano, G., Georgouli, C. & Milakis, D. Worthwhile travel time. A conceptual framework of the perceived value of enjoyment, productivity and fitness while travelling. Transp. Rev. 42, 580–603 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chen, Z., van Lierop, D. & Ettema, D. Dockless bike-sharing systems. What are the implications?. Transp. Rev. 40, 333–353 (2020).
Google Scholar
Groth, S., Klinger, T. & Otsuka, N. Geographies of new mobility services. The emergence of a premium mobility network space. Geoforum 144, 103765 (2023).
Stehlin, J. G. & Payne, W. B. Mesoscale infrastructures and uneven development. Bicycle sharing systems in the United States as “already splintered” urbanism. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geographers 112, 1065–1083 (2022).
Giannotti, M. et al. Inequalities in transit accessibility. Contributions from a comparative study between Global South and North metropolitan regions. Cities 109, 103016 (2021).
Google Scholar
Aberle, C. Who benefits from mobility as a service? A GIS-based investigation of the population served by four ride-pooling schemes in Hamburg, Germany. J. Cartogr. Geographic Inf. 70, 25–33 (2020).
Google Scholar
Tyndall, J. Where no cars go. Free-floating carshare and inequality of access. Int. J. Sustain. Transp.11, 433–442 (2016).
Google Scholar
Groth, S. Multimodal divide. Reproduction of transport poverty in smart mobility trends. Transp. Res. Part A 125, 56–71 (2019).
Peck, J. Uneven regional development. In International Encyclopedia of Geography (ed. Richardson, D. et al.) 1–13 (Wiley, 2017).
Harvey, D. The condition of postmodernity (Blackwell, 1989).
Wissen, M. & Naumann, M. Die Dialektik von räumlicher Angleichung und Differenzierung: Zum uneven-development-Konzept in der radical geography. ACME 7, 377–406 (2008).
Farmer, S. Uneven public transportation development in neoliberalizing Chicago, USA. Environ. Plan. A 43, 1154–1172 (2011).
Google Scholar
Groth, S., Hunecke, M. & Wittowsky, D. Middle-class, cosmopolitans and precariat among millennials between automobility and multimodality. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 12, 100467 (2021).
Hernandez, D. Uneven mobilities, uneven opportunities. Social distribution of public transport accessibility to jobs and education in Montevideo. J. Transp. Geogr. 67, 119–125 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kębłowski, W. & Bassens, D. All transport problems are essentially mathematical”. The uneven resonance of academic transport and mobility knowledge in Brussels. Urban Geogr. 39, 413–437 (2017).
Google Scholar
Petkov, D. The uneven development path of Bulgarian trolleybus transport – Leading back to the future?. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 8, 1383–1392 (2020).
Google Scholar
Reigner, H. & Brenac, T. Safe, sustainable… but depoliticized and uneven – a critical view of urban transport policies in France. Transp. Res. Part A 121, 218–234 (2019).
Siemiatycki, M. Urban transportation public–private partnerships. Drivers of uneven development?. Environ. Plan. A 43, 1707–1722 (2011).
Google Scholar
Stehlin, J. G. Cyclescapes of the unequal city. Bicycle infrastructure and uneven development (University of Minnesota Press, 2019).
Stehlin, J. G. & Tarr, A. R. Think regionally, act locally? Gardening, cycling, and the horizon of urban spatial politics. Urban Geogr. 38, 1329–1351 (2016).
Google Scholar
Dodel, M. & Hernandez, D. Smarter but more unequal transport? How socioeconomic and digital inequalities hinder adoption of mobility apps in the Global South. Travel Behav. Soc. 38, 100911 (2025).
Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M. Bike lanes are white lanes. Bicycle advocacy and urban planning (University of Nebraska Press, 2016).
Lucas, K., Mattioli, G., Verlinghieri, E. & Guzman, A. Transport poverty and its adverse social consequences. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Transp. 169, 353–365 (2016).
Mattioli, G., Lucas, K. & Marsden, G. Transport poverty and fuel poverty in the UK. From analogy to comparison. Transp. Policy 59, 93–105 (2017).
Google Scholar
Naumann, M. Mobilitätsarmut – ein Thema für die bundesdeutsche Raumentwicklung?. Standort 111, 1833 (2023).
Church, A., Frost, M. & Sullivan, K. Transport and social exclusion in London. Transp. Policy 7, 195–205 (2000).
Google Scholar
Lucas, K. Transport and social exclusion. Where are we now?. Transp. Policy 20, 105–113 (2012).
Google Scholar
Delbosc, A. & Currie, G. Transport problems that matter – social and psychological links to transport disadvantage. J. Transp. Geogr. 19, 170–178 (2011).
Google Scholar
Delbosc, A. & Currie, G. The spatial context of transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being. J. Transp. Geogr. 19, 1130–1137 (2011).
Google Scholar
Bauriedl, S. & Wiechers, H. Konturen eines Plattform-Urbanismus. Sub Urban Z. f.ür. Kritische Stadtforsch. 9, 93–114 (2021).
Google Scholar
Verlinghieri, E. & Schwanen, T. Transport and mobility justice. Evolving discussions. J. Transp. Geogr. 87, 102798 (2020).
Google Scholar
Martens, K. Transport justice. Designing fair transportation systems (Routledge, 2016).
Sheller, M. Theorising mobility justice. Tempo Soc. 30, 17–34 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lucas, K., Martens, K., Di Ciommo, F. & Dupont-Kieffer, A. Measuring transport equity (Elsevier, 2019).
Litman, T. Evaluating transportation equity (Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2017).
Manderscheid, K. The movement problem, the car and future mobility regimes. Automobility as dispositif and mode of regulation. Mobilities 9, 604–626 (2014).
Google Scholar
Brenner, N. A Thousand leaves. Notes on the geographies of uneven spatial development. In Leviathan undone? Towards a political economy of scale (eds, Keil, R. & Mahon, R.) 27–49 (University of British Columbia Press, 2009).
Omstedt, M. & Ebner, N. Introduction. Uneven development and social difference in capitalism. Environ. Plan A 56, 1298–1303 (2024).
Google Scholar
Luxemburg, R. Die Akkumulation des Kapitals. Ein Beitrag zur ökonomischen Erklärung des Imperialismus (Vorwärts-Verlag, 1913).
Tristl, C. Turning water into a commodity. Digital innovation and the private sector as development agent (Bristol University Press, 2025).
Castells, M. The rise of the network society. The information age: economy, society, and culture volume I, with a new preface with a new preface (John Wiley & Sons, 2001).
Castells, M. The internet galaxy. Reflections on the internet, business, and society (Oxford University Press, 2003).
Brezovec, P. & Hampl, N. Electric vehicles ready for breakthrough in MaaS? Consumer adoption of E-car sharing and E-scooter sharing as a part of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS). Energies 14, 1088 (2021).
Google Scholar
Seebauer, S. Why early adopters engage in interpersonal diffusion of technological innovations. An empirical study on electric bicycles and electric scooters. Transp. Res. Part A 78, 146–160 (2015).
Marsden, G. & Reardon, L. (eds). Governance of the smart mobility transition (Emerald Publishing, 2018).
Kesselring, S. Global transfer points: the making of airports in the mobile risk society. In Aeromobilities (eds. Cwerner, S., Kesselring, S. & Urry, J.) 51–72 (Routledge, 2009).
Clark, J. & Curl, A. Bicycle and avel? A socio-spatial analysis in Glasgow, UK. Soc. Incl. 4, 83 (2016).
Google Scholar
Goodman, A. & Cheshire, J. Inequalities in the London bicycle sharing system revisited. Impacts of extending the scheme to poorer areas but then doubling prices. J. Transp. Geogr. 41, 272–279 (2014).
Google Scholar
McKane, R. G. & Hess, D. J. Ridesourcing and urban inequality in Chicago. Connecting mobility disparities to unequal development, gentrification, and displacement. Environ. Plan A 2, 0308518X2110478 (2021).
Harvey, D. The spatial fix – Hegel, von Thunen, and Marx. Antipode 13, 1–12 (1981).
Google Scholar
Graham, S. & Marvin, S. Splintering urbanism. Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition (Routledge, 2001).
Graham, S. & Marvin, S. Splintering Urbanism at 20 and the “Infrastructural Turn”. J. Urban Technol. 29, 169–175 (2022).
Google Scholar
Marcuse, P. The Enclave, the Citadel, and the Ghetto. Urban Aff. Rev. 33, 228–264 (1997).
Google Scholar
Moran, M. Drawing the map. The creation and regulation of geographic constraints on shared bikes and e-scooters in San Francisco, CA. J. Transp. Land Use 14, (2021).
Moran, M. E., Laa, B. & Emberger, G. Six scooter operators, six maps. Spatial coverage and regulation of micromobility in Vienna, Austria. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 8, 658–671 (2020).
Google Scholar
Statistisches Bundesamt. Bundesländer mit Hauptstädten nach Fläche, Bevölkerung und Bevölkerungsdichte. (2023).
Landesbetrieb IT.NRW. In NRW lebte Ende 2020 fast die Hälfte der Bevölkerung in Großstädten. (2022).
Statista GmbH. Anzahl der Großstädte nach Bundesländern in Deutschland am 31. Dezember 2022. (2023).
Küpper, P. Abgrenzung und Typisierung ländlicher Räume. Thünen Working Paper 68 (Thünen, 2016).
Holz-Rau, C., Schultewolter, M., Aertker, J., Wachter, I. & Klinger, T. Eine Verkehrstypologie deutscher Großstädte. Raumforschung und Raumordnung Spatial Research and Planning; (2021).
Huo, J. et al. Influence of the built environment on E-scooter sharing ridership. A tale of five cities. J. Transp. Geogr. 93, 103084 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bai, S. & Jiao, J. Dockless E-scooter usage patterns and urban built Environments. A comparison study of Austin, TX, and Minneapolis, MN. Travel Behav. Soc. 20, 264–272 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hosseinzadeh, A., Algomaiah, M., Kluger, R. & Li, Z. Spatial analysis of shared e-scooter trips. J. Transp. Geogr. 92, 103016 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pazzini, M. et al. New micromobility means of transport. An analysis of E-scooter users’ behaviour in Trondheim. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19, 7374 (2022).
Google Scholar
Karimpour, A., Hosseinzadeh, A. & Kluger, R. A data-driven approach to estimating dockless electric scooter service areas. J. Transp. Geogr. 109, 103579 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kimpton, A. et al. Weather to scoot? How weather shapes shared e-scooter ridership patterns. J. Transp. Geogr. 104, 103439 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhu, R., Zhang, X., Kondor, D., Santi, P. & Ratti, C. Understanding spatio-temporal heterogeneity of bike-sharing and scooter-sharing mobility. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 81, 101483 (2020).
Google Scholar
Fina, S. et al. OS-WALK-EU. An open-source tool to assess health-promoting residential walkability of European city structures. J. Transp. Health 27, 101486 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung ARE. ÖV-Güteklassen – Berechnungsmethodik ARE (Grundlagenbericht, 2022).
Anselin, L. Lagrange multiplier test diagnostics for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity. Geographical Anal. 20, 1–17 (1988).
Google Scholar
Ward, J. H. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58, 236–244 (1963).
Google Scholar
Klinger, T., Kenworthy, J. R. & Lanzendorf, M. Dimensions of urban mobility cultures – a comparison of German cities. J. Transp. Geogr. 31, 18–29 (2013).
Google Scholar
Haustein, S. & Nielsen, T. A. S. European mobility cultures. A survey-based cluster analysis across 28 European countries. J. Transp. Geogr. 54, 173–180, (2016).
Google Scholar
Bortz, J. Statistik. für Sozialwissenschaftler. 5th ed. (Springer-Verlag, 1999).
Ruhrort, L. Reassessing the role of shared mobility services in a transport transition. Can they contribute the rise of an alternative socio-technical regime of mobility?. Sustainability 12, 8253 (2020).
Google Scholar
König, A., Gebhardt, L., Stark, K. & Schuppan, J. A multi-perspective assessment of the introduction of E-scooter sharing in Germany. Sustainability 14, 2639 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kuhnimhof, T., Buehler, R. & Dargay, J. A new generation. Travel trends for young Germans and Britons. Transp. Res. Rec. 2230, 58–67 (2011).
Google Scholar
European Commission. Paris bans shared e-scooters after a public consultation. Available at (2023).
Madrid Metropolitan. Madrid city council to ban E-scooters over safety concerns. Available at (2024).
Giddens, A. The consequences of modernity (Polity Press, 1992).
Banister, D. The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transp. Policy 15, 73–80 (2008).
Google Scholar
Canzler, W. & Knie, A. Mobility in the age of digital modernity. Why the private car is losing its significance, intermodal transport is winning and why digitalisation is the key. Appl. Mobilities 1, 56–67 (2016).
Google Scholar
Rüdiger, D. Der Erfolg von strengen Regeln für E-Scooter ist messbar. Nahverkehrspraxis 7/8, 24–26 (2023).
link
